![]() In other words, an emergent theory can often be derived from a large universality class of many underlying microscopic theories. For instance, two physical systems that undergo a second-order phase transition, while being very different microscopically, often obey exactly the same scaling laws, and are at the critical point described by the same emergent theory. This is true of all the most successful emergent theories they describe universal macroscopic phenomena whose underlying microscopic descriptions may be very different. As a result, the laws of thermodynamics are universal and independent of the details of the microscopic theory. These laws are not fundamental but are derived by statistical averaging – a huge data compression in which the individual motions of the microscopic particles are compressed into just a few macroscopic quantities such as temperature. ![]() ![]() How can our best theories of nature be so successful, while at the same time being merely emergent? Perhaps these theories are so successful precisely because they are emergent.Īs a warm up, let’s consider the laws of thermodynamics, which emerge from the microscopic motion of many molecules. Renormalisable quantum field theory, the foundation of the SM, works extraordinarily well. One can argue that intelligence, whether it occurs naturally, as in humans, or artificially, should also be viewed as an emergent phenomenon. The mechanism by which artificial intelligence is beginning to emerge from the complexity of underlying computing codes shows similarities with emergent phenomena in physics. Another striking example may be intelligence. It is even evident, often mesmerisingly so, at scales much larger than atoms or elementary particles, for example in the murmurations of a flock of birds – a phenomenon that is impossible to describe by following the motion of an individual bird. These concepts don’t exist at the level of individual atoms or molecules, and are very difficult to derive from the microscopic laws.Īs physicists continue to search for cracks in the Standard Model (SM) and Einstein’s general theory of relativity, could these natural laws in fact be emergent from a deeper reality? And emergence is not limited to the world of the very small, but by its very nature skips across orders of magnitude in scale. Good examples are the wetness of water and the superconductivity of an alloy. It deals with properties of a macroscopic system that have no meaning at the level of its microscopic building blocks. Emergence says that new and different kinds of phenomena arise in large and complex systems, and that these phenomena may be impossible, or at least very hard, to derive from the laws that govern their basic constituents. If discovered, all physical phenomena would follow from the application of its fundamental laws.Ī complementary perspective to reductionism is that of emergence. This view of nature is most evident in the search for a theory of everything – an idea that is nowadays more common in popularisations of physics than among physicists themselves. Particle physics is at its heart a reductionistic endeavour that tries to reduce reality to its most basic building blocks. Emergent simplicity The evolution of a murmuration of starlings cannot be described by following the motion of any individual bird. Erik Verlinde sizes up the Standard Model, gravity and intelligence as candidates for future explanation as emergent phenomena. ![]() Many physical laws ‘emerge’ from complexity thanks to a process of data compression.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |